ECONOMICS & MARKET INTELLIGENCE: The economics of elections: Case of Zambia

About a decade ago, Zambia was surfing a powerful wave of optimism as the copper-driven economy registered an all-time GDP growth rate of 10,3 percent in 2010.
The political landscape was also stable and in 2012, the country joined a small club of African nations that were borrowing on international bond markets. There was strong appetite for its debt, given the solid economic numbers that were being shown by Zambia.

Advertisements

However, economic growth then fell below five percent from 2015 onwards and in 2019 it tumbled to 1,4 percent and then -3 percent in 2020.
While Covid-19 played a big part, former President Edgar Lungu’s pursuit of expansionary fiscal policy for public investments resulted in widening fiscal deficits (8,3 percent of GDP in 2019 and 11 percent of GDP in 2020).

His authoritarian approach and dysfunctional politics in Zambia were also a major culprit as the expansionary fiscal policy, mainly financed by external and local borrowing, also caused Zambia’s public and publicly guaranteed debt to hit 91,6 percent of GDP in 2019 and 104 percent in 2020.

In November 2020, Zambia became the first African country to default in the Covid-19 era as it opted to bow out of a US$42,5 million eurobond repayment.

Opposition United Party for National Development leader Hakainde Hichilema was this week, declared winner of the 2021 presidential race in Zambia, after soundly defeating Lungu. Hichilema’s mammoth task on taking office will be to tackle an economy wracked by high debt, inflation and unemployment.

Further, to attain debt sustainability, Zambia will have to stop accumulating new external debt, increase domestic revenues and curb runaway public spending. This could mean raising taxes, restrain spending and prioritising creditor repayments.

The Zambian economy is projected to grow by one percent in 2021 and then two percent in 2022. The recovery in international demand and copper prices has been a positive development.

Overall, Zambian presidential elections were labelled as “free and fair”. Regional blocs such as Sadc have praised the citizenry for overseeing a peaceful transition of power. It should be highlighted that despite occasional episodes of political violence, Zambia has earned a reputation for political stability.
Every transition of power has been peaceful since the former British colony adopted its multi-party system in 1990. Democracy, human rights, free elections, inclusiveness, equality, freedom of assembly and expression, rule of law are some of the ideals that have been endorsed and are being promoted in modern day societies.

However, the important question is whether democracy creates a better opportunity for economic development?
Scholars such as Milton Friedman have argued that a higher degree of rights fosters economic development. A wealth of other studies suggest that democracy promotes economic liberalisation and that democracy is preferable for long-term and sustainable growth.

However, there is no consensus on the correlations between democracy and economic growth. An interesting case study is China. From the Asian financial crisis in 1997, to the Covid era in 2019, China’s economic growth rate has never fallen below five percent and has even reached as high as 14 percent. In stark contrast, however, China records a decreasing trend in its democracy index. That said, Morgan & Co Research contends that not upholding democratic principles may create constraints for developing nations like Zambia and Zimbabwe and this may negatively impact on economic development. Political risk also works against the country’s efforts to attract the much-needed foreign investment flows.

We maintain that Zimbabwe needs to do all the things necessary to attract foreign and regional partners to not just grow but survive in the new global economy. International investors today possess a plethora of investment options in the form of asset classes and projects they can invest in.
Zambia, Malawi and even South Africa are competing for investment allocations from the same global investment market.

In other words, Zimbabwe’s political or economic demise can be, in a way, an advantage for other African states.
Curbing corruption, improving the ease of doing business and upholding democratic ideals goes a long way in attracting capital flows into Zimbabwe.
Government policies in Zimbabwe should also be modelled around boosting productivity by focusing more on factors that lead to economic growth.

These include accumulation of capital stock, labour inputs and technological advancements.
That said, financial services remain key catalysts in this productivity matrix.
Investors on our market can play this theme through exposure in Old Mutual Zimbabwe Limited, First Capital Bank Limited and NMBZ Holdings.

Matsika is the head of research at Morgan & Co, and founder of piggybankadvisor.com. He can be reached on +263 78 358 4745 or batanai@morganzim.com / batanai@piggybankadvisor.com

Related posts

LEADERSHIP MINDSET COACHING: Fostering entrepreneurial leadership for growth

TAX MATTERS: Zimra’s pay-now-argue-later principle

TAX MATTERS: Transfer pricing: Emerging trends

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More